• Monday to Friday: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm
Twitter Linkedin-in Youtube
dge-logo-flat

SMART SPECIALTY CHEMICALS

A court in Nevada awarded $8 million to a Barley’s visitor after beer was replaced with a cleaning solution

 

In Clark County, Nevada, jurors awarded $8 million in compensation to Henderson resident Lon Enright. The reason was an incident at Barley’s Casino & Brewing Company, where the man was served a chemical solution used to flush the draft lines instead of a beer sample.

According to the case file, the situation occurred on December 18, 2018, while watching a football game. Enright expected to try the Honey Blonde Ale that the bartender offered and did not suspect that the glass contained something other than a drink.

How the sample turned into a chemical solution

In a statement by the plaintiff’s representatives, it was noted that the venue’s staff knew about the technical work. The draft lines at that moment had been taken out of service for cleaning, but the offer to try the beer was still made.

The key circumstances as presented by the plaintiff’s side looked like this:

What internal procedures were in place at the bar during the flushing and exactly how the lines were labeled is not clear from the publicly available materials. This gap leaves room for questions about at what stage the error arose and whether it was an isolated one.

The composition of the solution and why it is considered dangerous

The chemicals that, according to the case materials, entered Enright’s body were identified as potassium hydroxide and nonylphenol polyethylene glycol ether. Such a mixture is used for sanitizing equipment where organic deposits must be removed.

Potassium hydroxide is a strong alkali, that is, a substance with high alkaline activity that can corrode organic tissue on contact. In everyday comparisons, its effect is often described as an aggressive “dissolving” of grime, but in the body such chemistry acts not on buildup but on mucous membranes and soft tissues.

At the same time, public reports did not specify the concentration of the solution or the exact amount consumed, which is important for the medical picture and risk assessment. In practice, the severity of damage often depends on how quickly contact stopped and what measures were taken in the first minutes.

First aid on site and the first hours after the incident

When first responders arrived at the scene, they reportedly considered the only available way to help to be diluting the chemicals as much as possible. The victim was advised to drink large amounts of water—literally liters.

Such a tactic is known for certain types of chemical exposure as an emergency measure, when the task is to reduce the concentration of the substance until arrival at a medical facility. Details of subsequent hospitalization and clinical procedures were not disclosed in the available account, and this does not allow the full chronology of treatment to be reconstructed.

Medical consequences according to the plaintiff’s side

In the lawsuit, Enright pointed to nerve and tissue damage after the solution entered his body. The attorneys described the condition as prolonged and requiring monitoring, with effects that go beyond short-term poisoning.

In the law firm’s account, the consequences included:

These statements reflect the plaintiff’s position and that of his representatives and are not a medical conclusion published in the public record. Certain details, for example the prognosis for recovery of taste and the dynamics of symptoms, were not disclosed in the reports.

Who took part in the dispute and what the defense said

The plaintiff was Lon Enright, a special education teacher in Clark County. The defendant in the materials was named as Barley’s Casino & Brewing Company, and the venue was operated by Town Center Amusements, a subsidiary of Station Casinos.

Enright’s interests were represented by Panish | Shea | Boyle | Ravipudi LLP, and attorney Andre M. Lagomarsino was mentioned among the representatives. On the defendant’s side, according to the plaintiff’s lawyers, responsibility for the injuries was denied until four days before the start of the trial.

After the change in position, the dispute, it was claimed, effectively came down to the question of the amount that the jury should determine. Public details about the motives for such a reversal and the company’s internal reviews were scarcely provided in the available reports.

The verdict and the structure of the compensation

The jurors decided on the amount in 2 hours and awarded a total of $8 million. Of that, $3 million was attributed to past damages, which were described as physical and psychological pain, emotional distress, anxiety, trauma, limitations, and reduced quality of life.

Another $5 million the jury awarded as future damages, implying further consequences and expenses related to treatment and long-term complications. The verdict was entered in Clark County District Court on Wednesday, March 18.

The court ordered the payment of $8 million after a visitor at Barley’s was served a chemical solution used to flush the lines instead of beer.

What this could mean for the brand and other land-based casinos

But the greatest damage was to the casino’s reputation. After all, under intense pressure from the iGaming industry, such scandals only worsen the situation for land-based casinos. They already cannot fully compete with their online counterparts for several reasons:

These and many other advantages of iGaming have led modern online casinos to rapidly take customers from traditional operators. In such conditions, scandals like this cast a shadow over the reputation of the entire gambling sector.